On 2015-12-09 17:22, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > hmmm, I wonder in how far a lob popcon non-free package is relevant for > Jessie point releases. IMHO this creates more work for all involved > parties than it is worth the issue. Please correct me if I'm wrong and > I'll do what needs to be done.
So far the SRM accepted fixes for FTBFS(-like) bugs in jessie (or the non-free appendix to jessie) without questioning. If we consider some packages not worth fixing RC bugs in stable, perhaps they shouldn't have been part of stable (or stable/non-free) in the first place? Yes, it's a trivial fix and probably noone will run into the problem in real world setups, but where should the line be drawn? Andreas
