Package: gnome-keyring Version: 3.18.2-1 Severity: normal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi, I understand from bug#787786 that GNOME should ensure that most possible of its features is getting used. As already pointed out in bug#787786#18, there are other sensible of gnome-keyring other than in concert with the GNOME desktop. I agree that favoring pinentry-gtk2 over pinentry-gnome is wrong, but _only_ hard depending on pinentry-gnome makes it impossible¹ to use gnome-keyring without also pulling in pinentry-gnome and its (for some non-GNOME uses) too excessive dependencies. Please consider the following, which I believe satisfies both the need for ensuring best GNOME experience and supporting lighter alternatives: * Have dependency on pinentry-gnome fallback to pinentry-gtk2 * Recommend pinentry-gnome Thanks for considering, - Jonas ¹ Impossible while using pure Debian. Custom tricks like creating a fake package by same name is possible - resulting in a _derivative_ of Debian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWaCfMAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhCfsP/AwpWR+Z2DloBjZ5yhvP3Q9t tHKDFV8FkQtmPvdvorz/Ku5hxJ+dEfyGoJzTB1Iw0GIh/xfw+fIe4FS1qNq3hU7e VFbzr51Aco+28CUH97z6sKvM2s6XfDHaX5EznlVM1C42efIc+u68z2HuW9Q4NPJl a3ZmkUcR18TE+bahNwDisriZLELw3hQ6eX9Nq8qt485fC49ndN0RvqNLU7gwx7qB 6+xoamOPhNqD7NwTTR7hdnUa4NfDsXOyPt1Ci4XNQhlvMVyFVXu+/iwxCy0xTUZW +bB4UmsuQT9dOgCZmMdQmrEGPSUfi/8O/g/FllVunSboMAZu+m/4oaqFXwB77hG3 AnwEEJG8fNmyEp9jRlNyy2HMpSneDz1u1Gi/zLNtlIWf2w5dcPcjAfk3tyMvpQWD Yn1sd/kjH9PzMWF9WAPTLUavBb2dzozjgQaIROHVnYlgzFQvFituNDXKL+sEkI2w 2G+8Od9GaaVQOreIg/K/4c8v6Yc0vb7g7eFOqUaKhUHuTxHtvrsq7blNksvPGJPR unS/KM9A41s9jMCsdSPeIN1CiOzd8TK/6UCrJuy7zhASMZOtzLudv/VLKywUCWIK Few93XOjUmaDUL1s6QUrWF2kYFI2aR4tjU9m8IzPNj7ZKikSoTSx6S2fduYp9UeN atOSQ3ghsc2Qqg4lDZiV =S+3s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
