Hello, gentlemen. Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote on 04/12/2015 22:04:38:
> James, > > you need to keep the original bug submitter Cc:ed if you want them to > see your reply. Not to worry. I should have kept track of the bug report as well. > On 2015-12-04 15:13, James Price wrote: > > Thanks for the report. I’ve actually applied a slightly different fix for > this a little while back (see [1]), but that revision has yet to be uploaded. > > > > The fix I applied was essentially the same as has been done for the opencl- > headers package, described in [2]. This just uses __vector instead of vector > to avoid conflicts with similarly named types. > > > > If you think the '-mno-altivec’ fix is preferable then I can revert my patch > and apply yours instead. > > I think -mno-altivec is rather a quick workaround and __vector the > proper fix. Yes, I agree with Andreas. Mine was just a less invasive workaround, because I preferred not to mess with the code. > > > Otherwise I’ll just request that the latest revision be uploaded. > > I'll take care of that next week. Great, thanks! -- Fernando Seiti Furusato Software Engineer IBM Brazil - Linux Technology Center
