>2009-02-19 13:01 Francesco Potort�:
>>
>>
>>[...]
>>
>> tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree
>> Reading state information... Done
>> Reading extended state information
>> Initializing package states... Done
>> Reading task descriptions... Done
>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>> glpk-doc{u} glpk-utils{u}
>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 1892kB will be freed.
>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] n
>> Abort.
>>
>>Something is going wrong. I cannot seem to be able to tell aptitude
>>that I really want those packages.
>
>Unfortunately this package does not exist and the new octave-info
>doesn't have the same dependencies.
>
>But in general, I have not observed this kind of behaviour nor have seen
>bugs reported related to this in the recent years/versions. Some parts
>of the resolver were changed a lot in those years, esp. in the run up to
>0.6.
>
>Have you experienced the same behaviour since, or did it only happen
>during that time?
Maybe I have had the same behaviour other times, but I do not remember.
The only thing that I know is that I still remember that every time I
tried using nomarkauto it did not work, but it is not something that I
do often.
Also, I suspect that nomarkauto is a rarely used command, so I would not
rely on lack of feedback to assume that it works. And osrry, I have not
ime now to devise a different test to check the functionality of
unmarkauto.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39.050.621.3058
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Mobile: +39.348.8283.107
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Skype: wnlabisti
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it
