On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 10:44:15PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Lars,
> 
> Thanks for the quick follow up. First of all, since it was not clear,
> in my previous mail, the files are not actually included in the
> backup, see just the doubled processing time and found files.

Hi,

thanks, I finally found the problem. It was fairly obvious with your
test case. The cause was that the scan_tree method would exclude a
cache directory (hence, not visible in the "obnam ls" output), but
would still scan through its contents (and, hence, Obnam would back up
those files).

I've pushed a fix, and a release is forthcoming. To recover from the
problem, remove the generations made with Obnam 1.18 or 1.18.1.

-- 
Schrödinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is
undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to