Control: tags -1 pending

On 2015-10-28, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:20 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2015-10-27, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> > The attached patch creates a rockchip package and enables the
>> > firefly-rk3288 platform.

Uploaded to experimental, stuck in NEW due to the new u-boot-rockchip
package...


>> I'm wondering if it wouldn't be cleaner to add support to upstream's
>> Makefile to build u-boot-spl-dtb.rksd images, rather than muck around
>> in debian/rules?
>
> Something i've been thinking about but didn't have the time for, that
> should solve your issue with cross-building indeed.
>
>>  Or simply document the process to generate the rksd images in
>> README.Debian?
>
> Personally I think the less runes are needed for people to update u-
> boot on their devices the better. But that should work fine as a
> temporary measure at least :)

I left out the u-boot-spl-dtb.rksd support entirely, and neglected to
mention anything in u-boot-rockchip.README.Debian ... but that's fixable
when it actually hits the archive... let me know if you make progress on
a way to build it that's also cross-buildable!


live well,
  vagrant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to