Control: reopen -1 On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:29:54 -0500, Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 31, 2015 3:15 PM, "Michael Gilbert" <mgilb...@debian.org> wrote: > > The submitter also mentioned armel. Should we support that? I guess > > the better question is if it's supported upstream? > > Yes, armel is supported upstream.
Thanks for the info, I'm re-opening the bug then. Regards, Stephen
pgpWfaKdYcCn8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
