On Thursday 22 October 2015 14:13:14 you wrote: > Hi, > > please always keep the bug in Cc otherwise discussions don't get recorded. > In this case, the package list you posted would be helpful to actually > appear in the bug.. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Dr. Ernst-Dieter Klinkenberg wrote: > > Hallo and a question, do you speak german? (would be easyer for me to be > > more detailed) > > I do, but this is unfortunately not relevant for here, bug report language > is english. > > You can tell me stuff in German but I then need to rephrase it for this bug > report... > > > This is my first debian bug report and I use the tool "reportbug-ng" > > Against what package? > > > > I have honestly no idea why one can get the idea to file this against > > > wnpp > > > and file a Request for package if one can report it against > > > libreoffice-calc (or, if one doesnÄt know that package itself to > > > libreoffice).. Reassigning :) > > > > see above (btw. what is wnpp?) > > bugs.debian.org/wnpp. wnpp.debian.org > > You filed a "Request for package"... > > > did not know ... and do not know how to report "correctly" > > Well, even in other disros you need to fgile it agianst the correct > component or package ;). > > > I feel it is quite difficult to report errors "correctly" > > The reporting tool came up at the end with the email I sended > > No. You just need to choose "libreoffice" as what you report against. > > But anyway, let's get to the point > > > ii libreoffice 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite (metapackage) > > ii libreoffice-avmedia-back 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 GStreamer > > backend for LibreOffice > > ii libreoffice-base 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- database > > ii libreoffice-base-core 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- shared library > > ii libreoffice-base-drivers 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 Database > > connectivity drivers for LibreOffice > > ii libreoffice-calc 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- spreadsheet > > ii libreoffice-common 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office > > productivity suite -- arch-independent files > > ii libreoffice-core 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- arch-dependent files > > ii libreoffice-draw 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- drawing > > ii libreoffice-impress 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- presentation > > ii libreoffice-java-common 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office > > productivity suite -- arch-independent Java su > > ii libreoffice-kde 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- KDE integration > > ii libreoffice-math 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- equation editor > > ii libreoffice-pdfimport 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 PDF > > Import > > component for LibreOffice > > ii libreoffice-report-build 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 > > LibreOffice component for building database reports - > > ii libreoffice-style-galaxy 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office > > productivity suite -- Galaxy (Default) symbol > > ii libreoffice-style-tango 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 all office > > productivity suite -- Tango symbol style > > ii libreoffice-writer 1:5.0.3~rc1-2 amd64 office > > productivity suite -- word processor > > Nothing else? No libreoffice-l10n or so? As you above talked about feeling > better with german I'd assume you installed the german language package, > too? Sure in former times
I did it now reinstall just in the moment .... root@kli:~# apt-get install libreoffice-l10n-de Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert: libreoffice-common libreoffice-java-common libreoffice-style-galaxy libreoffice-style-tango ... and error vanished!!! > > What happens if you upgrade the things you still have at 1:5.0.3~rc1-1 to > their current version? This shouldn't affect anything as the change between > -1 and -2 didn't affect real package contents, but... > > How did you upgrade in the first place? As recommended (unstable as repository) apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade > > > First I thougt this a LO error and squeezed the LO people but they > > pointed me to a correctly working experimental built 5.02-2 It was a special developer built tar-ball with debs which installed in /opt without interferring the apt-package database ... > > There's no "experimental build 5.02-2". But yes, I'd assume that it > will work also at home when I am going to try this.. So what, I only used the basic debian tools apt-get, dpkg for all deb operations (1) lost libreoffice-l10n-de sometimes during the upgrade process (2) I can not imagine how the internals of a program "calc" can be confused by a missing language package > > Regards, > > Rene Thanks for your time! Greetings Ernst-Dieter -- Dr. E.-D. Klinkenberg Siegfried-Witte-Str. 3 D-18055 Rostock email d.klinkenb...@gmx.net Tel: 0381-120 39 38 Mobil: 0162-90 31 368
