On Oct 21, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > My view is that those parts of the internet have said they don't want such > mail, but that's there call. It is always the receivers' call, but enough receivers implement DMARC that we as senders will have to deal with it no matter what our opinions are on its merit.
> For regular Debian mailing lists, the list masters chose strategy #1 (make is > so originating DKIM signatures are not invalidated by the mailing list). I > don't think this is feasible for the BTS. Strategy #2 is, in my opinion, > ugly, but would work. Agreed, but implementing ARC would still be a better solution. I expect that next spring it will be more clear how much work this will require. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
