On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:01:58PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:25:35PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: git-buildpackage > > Version: 0.6.32 > > Severity: normal > > > > Not sure what's going on, but today gbp dch stopped finding tags with > > a dot instead of an underscore. Those tags are generated by debcommit > > -r. > > > > jak@jak-x230:~/Projects/Debian/apt$ gbp dch --verbose > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--show-cdup'] > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--is-bare-repository'] > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', 'HEAD'] > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'show-ref', 'refs/heads/debian/experimental'] > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'tag', '-l', '1.1_exp13'] > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'tag', '-l', '1.1.exp13'] > > gbp:debug: ['git', 'cat-file', '-p', '1.1.exp13'] > > gbp:error: Version 1.1~exp13 not found > > jak@jak-x230:~/Projects/Debian/apt$ git tag -l 1.1.exp13 > > 1.1.exp13 > > jak@jak-x230:~/Projects/Debian/apt$ git cat-file -p 1.1.exp13 > > object ebd8621e5b18446dd251e90f79aa7576c6cb83b2 > > type commit > > tag 1.1.exp13 > > tagger Michael Vogt <m...@ubuntu.com> 1444062630 +0200 > > Do you have --upstream-branch set correctly? We need a more clever > probing for that one. Might be different since you're packaging an > experimental version.
It's a native package, and debian-branch is correct, whereas upstream-branch is unset (but setting it does not change anything). Strangely enough, this used to work during DebConf, so it seems to be a regression caused by one of gbp's dependencies (git 2.6?). -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. Be friendly, do not top-post, and follow RFC 1855 "Netiquette". - If you don't I might ignore you.
