Hi! I've tried to use ld86 as suggested, it sounded good as we are already using as86, so why not using ld86... well, it didn't like us using -b on as86 to produce the binary 512 bytes of our mbr and if we tried to produce a relocatable object using: ld86 -r -o mbr.o mbr.b it would say: ld86: mbr.b has bad magic number so... I suppose that's why the original author was using ld instead.
I don't want to waste time on making it compile for arches where it is of little use, the only way to avoit this FTBFS I believe is by adding the list of all the compiling architectures to the Architecture field. That is, unless somebody comes with a new sugestion or recipe for this. Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
