Building the doc is not that hard (I am building it all the time). The doc to do it is just patchy.
The most centralized source of information might be interested here: https://bitbucket.org/rpy2/rpy2/issues/293/fix-and-do-regression-tests-for-docs Otherwise, the dynamic part are beginning to also be checked in version control, so the doc builds on readthedocs. Building it the same way should be as easy as "make html" or "make latexpdf" when starting from a clone of the repos. L. P.S.: Enjoy Tokyo. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015, 6:32 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 8 October 2015 at 21:56, Julien Puydt wrote: > | Package: python-rpy2 > | Version: 2.7.0-1 > | Severity: wishlist > | > | Hi, > | > | first, the binary python-rpy2 package suggests python-rpy-docs which > | doesn't exist (python-rpy-doc does, but it's for the previous version!). > | > | Could you please ship a python-rpy2-doc package? > > I have in the past, but Laurent used to either drop documentation, or > require > pieces we don't have, or create other issues for. I was otherwise always a > big fan -- forst project where I saw sphinx in action way back when. > > Laurent, what do I need for 'make doc' these days? > > Greeetings from Tokyo, Dirk > > | > | Thanks, > | > | Snark on #debian-python > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org >
