Package: pandoc
Version: 1.12.4.2~dfsg-1+b14
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I ran unit-tests for (py)pandoc on my new Debian machine. In contrast to
oldstable, pandoc now deletes text when converting from Org-mode to HTML or
HTML5.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I am using this short example file:
| vk@sherri ~2d % cat source.org
| foo ~bar~ *baz*
| vk@sherri ~2d %
* What was the outcome of this action?
Converting via pandoc (or pypandoc) deletes the "bar" text from the content:
| vk@sherri ~2d % pandoc -f org -t html source.org
| <p>foo <strong>baz</strong></p>
| vk@sherri ~2d % pandoc -f org -t html5 source.org
| <p>foo <strong>baz</strong></p>
| vk@sherri ~2d %
* What outcome did you expect instead?
With a prior version of Debian oldstable, I got a different result (from my
memory, code-tags were used definitely according to my unit tests):
| <p>foo <code>bar</code> <strong>baz</strong></p>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.utf8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages pandoc depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u1
ii libffi6 3.1-2+b2
ii libgmp10 2:6.0.0+dfsg-6
ii libicu52 52.1-8+deb8u3
ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.5-7.1
ii libpcre3 2:8.35-3.3
ii libyaml-0-2 0.1.6-3
ii pandoc-data 1.12.4.2~dfsg-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
pandoc recommends no packages.
Versions of packages pandoc suggests:
pn etoolbox <none>
pn pandoc-citeproc <none>
ii texlive-latex-recommended 2014.20141024-2
pn texlive-luatex <none>
ii texlive-xetex 2014.20141024-2
-- no debconf information-- Karl Voit
