On 2015-09-23 19:49, andrey.gur...@e-mail.ua wrote: > 23.09.2015, 19:44, "Andreas Beckmann" <a...@debian.org>: >> On 2015-09-23 18:22, andrey.gur...@e-mail.ua wrote: >>> dear maintainers, the package amd-opencl-icd 15.7 contains a different >>> libamdocl64.so than in the 15.7 fglrx release (and even the one residing on >>> debian server). But how could this happen? >> Can someone please check the package in jessie-backports? > Andreas, if you mean [1], then I downloaded [2] and it contains a "broken" > one: Thanks.
The build process runs strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note --strip-unneeded debian/amd-opencl-icd/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libamdocl64.so which is regular procedure for all shared libraries and should be a safe operation, but the library provided by AMD seems to be fragile this time. Is the amd-ocl-icd:i386 package affected as well? (I.e. does it not work, having "just" a different file size due to stripping is not enough.) Running clinfo (the i386 binary!) should be sufficient to list the available devices. Andreas
