On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 14:46:39 +0100 Simon McVittie <s...@pseudorandom.co.uk> wrote: > On 06/09/15 10:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 09:12:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> The short version is, yes the rename is the right thing to do. > > > > I have done this as a non-maintainer upload with the attached debdiff. > > I haven't used the DELAYED queues, because the release team want this > > multi-transition to be over. > > My upload was rejected with: > > libginac5v5-dbg: lintian output: 'empty-binary-package ', automatically > rejected package. > libginac5v5-dbg: If you have a good reason, you may override this > lintian tag. > > so my patch is clearly not 100% right. I'll check more thoroughly and > upload a fixed version later today if nobody else gets there first. > > I'd also be happy to sponsor a minimal update for this if you need it > (send a debdiff or a .dsc + .diff.gz to the bug address, or upload the > .dsc + .diff.gz somewhere and tell the bug address where to find it). > > S >
Hi, Are there any update on this? AFAICT the upload has /not/ happened yet. Is anything blocking the upload (beyond someone doing it)? Thanks, ~Niels
