On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:01:16PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Hi, > > 2013-11-21 00:05 Matthias Klumpp: > >forcemerge 137771 729761 > >thanks > > > >Hi! > >This is a bug which has been known for a long time, and is the #1 > >reason why I recommend using apt-get over aptitude ;-) > >Hopefully this will be fixed soon, but after so much time has passed, > >I doubt that. (I am also not sure what the problem is currently) > >Cheers, > > Matthias > > > > > >2013/11/21 Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>: > >>reassign 729761 aptitude > >>retitle 729761 aptitude: Does not set holds in apt > >>thanks > >> > >>On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:14:55AM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > >>>2013/11/17 Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>: > >>>> Package: gnome-packagekit > >>>> Version: 3.8.2-4 > >>>> Severity: normal > >>>> > >>>> I have several packages on hold. Despite that, gnome-packagekit > >>>> repeatedly pops up a notification about software updates, asking me to > >>>> update those packages. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know if this bug lies in gnome-packagekit or in packagekit > >>>> itself. > >>>PackageKit/Aptcc does respect holds in Apt. You should use apt-mark to > >>>properly set a package on hold, like "apt-mark hold <pkgname>". > >>>If that works, everything is fine :-) > >>>Aptcc does not parse the custom files set by Aptitude, it only > >>>respects Apt settings in that regard. > >> > >>Interesting. Sounds like a bug in aptitude for not using apt's holds. > >>Thanks for the clarification. > >> > >>- Josh Triplett > > I wanted to give you a heads-up about this bug report, because since > it's so long after the it was submitted and if you see a bug-closed > message for the merged bug #137771, maybe you don't notice it. > > So the news is that I commited a change that I believe that it will fix > the issue. If you are still interested in the outcome of this bug > report and to see if it was really fixed, it would be great if you could > check if the problems that you were observing are gone once it's > released.
Do you have a link to the commit? I don't see a bug-closed message for 137771. - Josh Triplett