Control: tag -1 + confirmed upstream 16.09.2015 01:54, Ben Longbons wrote: > Package: qemu-user-static > Version: 1:2.4+dfsg-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > I recently discovered systemd-nspawn and machinectl. After working > through various bugs (try to use at least systemd 226 on the host) > I started playing with emulated builds, but a full boot didn't work.
Thank you very much for this detailed bugreport. Unfortunately yes, as you discovered, a few syscalls aren't implemented in qemu-user (it is a general problem, syscall implementation isn't arch-specific, it is done in a common source file). And new ones are added in linux all the time. > Looking at the arm64 syscall list, 264 is sys_name_to_handle_at and 74 is > sys_signalfd4. Yes, neither of these two syscalls are imlemented in upstream qemu. It shouldn't be difficult to implement, but as usual it all boils down to available time and the "amounf of need" in something ;) Maybe some day... Out of curiocity, why do you want systemd-nspawn with a foreign chroot? Thanks, /mjt
