On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:26:12 -0400 "Aaron M. Ucko" <u...@debian.org> wrote: > Source: opensurgsim > Version: 0.6.0-2 > Severity: important > Justification: fails to build from source > > Builds of opensurgsim on mips, mipsel, and s390x all failed with > errors in SurgSimFrameworkTest's TimerTest, along the following lines: > > [ RUN ] TimerTest.SettingFrames > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/SurgSim/Framework/UnitTests/TimerTest.cpp:44: Failure > Value of: timer->getLastFrameRate() > Actual: 34156.5 > Expected: timer->getAverageFrameRate() > Which is: nan > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/SurgSim/Framework/UnitTests/TimerTest.cpp:45: Failure > Value of: timer->getLastFramePeriod() > Actual: 2.9277e-05 > Expected: timer->getAverageFramePeriod() > Which is: nan > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/SurgSim/Framework/UnitTests/TimerTest.cpp:46: Failure > Value of: timer->getCumulativeTime() > Actual: nan > Expected: timer->getLastFramePeriod() > Which is: 2.9277e-05 > [ FAILED ] TimerTest.SettingFrames (1 ms) > [ RUN ] TimerTest.Comparison > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/SurgSim/Framework/UnitTests/TimerTest.cpp:74: Failure > Expected: (timer1->getAverageFramePeriod()) >= > (timer2->getAverageFramePeriod()), actual: nan vs nan > /«PKGBUILDDIR»/SurgSim/Framework/UnitTests/TimerTest.cpp:75: Failure > Expected: (timer1->getCumulativeTime()) > (timer1->getLastFramePeriod()), > actual: nan vs 2.4686e-05 > [ FAILED ] TimerTest.Comparison (7 ms) > > Both tests failed on mips and mipsel, but only TimerTest.SettingFrames > failed on s390x. Could you please take a look?
I think I fixed this, and pushed changes to the packaging repository [2]. I would like to test these changes before uploading a new version. I just applied for access to the porter machines, and I will test the patch when/if I get access. Thanks again, -Paul [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/opensurgsim.git/commit/?id=3ba6f4e10f048f261c4badf3c884ff31261e7a6a
