* Christoph Biedl <debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de>, 2015-09-14, 18:53:
I'd even rather produce a *big*-endian magic.mgc, assuming little-endian archs have more computing power in general.
I'm not sure it's a valid assumption. The most popular "slow" architectures these days are armel and armhf, which are little-endian.
my plan still is to ship magic.mgc in a separate package as (tentative name) "libmagic-mgc", marked "Architecture: any" and "Multi-Arch: foreign".
[...]
Thoughts?
Sounds good to me! -- Jakub Wilk
