On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:14 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Sep 10 2015, Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:00:27PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> The s3ql package is not migrating to testing. As far as I understand, > >> this is because it's not building on armhf. [...] > >> If so, is there a way to make an exception here and allow migration? > > > > It's not an exception, but if you want to not ship s3ql on armhf in Stretch > > you can ask ftp-masters to remove it from sid, taking into account any > > reverse dependencies. > > Hasn't s3ql *already* been removed from testing? At least this is what I > conclude from https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/s3ql.
Yes. Jonathan said "remove it from sid", and that's what he meant. adsb@franck:~$ dak ls s3ql -s unstable s3ql | 2.13+dfsg-1 | unstable | source, armhf s3ql | 2.13+dfsg-2 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x If you want the package to migrate, the out-of-date armhf binary needs to not be in unstable - either because you've asked ftp-master to remove it, or because the package builds on armhf again. Regards, Adam
