On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 18:58 -0400, Mike Miller wrote:
> But this is only to eliminate or implicate NM. If we already think NM 
> is implicated, then nevermind.

And if the only thing that NM is accused of is not working well when
you try to set network devices up behind its back, then nevermind
indeed.

It would be nice to have Juniper support which *does* work properly
with NetworkManager. It's possible for now just by building
libopenconnect with Juniper as the default, instead of AnyConnect.

Before I support it for real, I really want to sort out the HTML
authentication forms (letting the UI render real HTML instead of the
hack I currently have to parse the known forms and fail on anything non
-standard).

-- 
dwmw2

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to