On Friday 04 September 2015 20:24:04 Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 04/09/15 07:36 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > Also I'm not sure about license name: text of the license is not classic > > BSD-2-clause so perhaps it is better written as "BSD-2-clause/AMPQ" or > > something like this... > > hmm, AMPQ? do you mean amqp? There is an amqp license and its different: > https://www.amqp.org/legal/amqp-license > > I think its like BSD, and I have included the verbatim copy in > debian/copyright.
I mean their BSD-like license is neither BSD-2-clause [1] nor BSD-3-clause [2] hence it would be wrong to call it "BSD-2-clause" because the text of the license is not canonical. [1]: http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause [2]: http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- There is nothing more odious than the majority. It consist of a few powerful men who lead the way; of accommodating rascals and submissive weaklings; and of a mass of men who trot after them without in the least knowing their own minds. -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
