On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:03:43AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > (In the absence of this bug being fixed, what is the correct approach > when all reverse-deps found are in fact satisfied by a virtual > package?)
I've been advised that the check is only advisory so and once reviewed, the erroneous output can be ignored. I've updated <https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals> accordingly. Dominic.
