On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 03:48 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > You are wrong, just wrong. module-assistant is more than a simple GUI, > please read at least its package description.
With all due respect, in what way am I "Wrong"? Regardless of how functional module-assistant is, kernel-package can do the job to the extent that I require, and does so. Thus, I don't see why I'm forced to add module-assistant to my system when I'm not going to use it. The entirety of my kernel build system is done using kernel-package. It still works, and so far as I can see, has not been orphaned. Because module-assistant has similar functionality is not an adequate reason to deny my request. If there's been some official debian mandate that requires the switch to module-assistant, can you please direct me to somewhere I can read it? I know you're the maintainer/author of module-assistant, but please consider not using Debian as a platform for pushing your own software on other people. Thanks Andrew > > Eduard. > > --=20 > Die Selbstt=E4uschung beherrscht der Mensch noch sicherer als die L=FCge. > -- Fjodor Michailowitsch Dostojewski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
