-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 27-08-15 01:58, Gilles Filippini wrote: > I just don't understand why this bug was assigned back to src:hdf5. > A piece of explanation from vorlon would have been appreciated. > Anyway, I'll assign it back to release.d.o when I'll have the > rdepends builds checked.
I suspect this was because he's doing the GCC 5 transition in Ubuntu, and they've chosen to do a v5 rename for hdf5 (like they've done for netcdf and others too). He probably didn't want to do another transition, but this is all an educated guess. I suggest to reassign the hdf5 transition issue back to release.debian.org, because I would also like to see a single hdf5 transition instead of two (I made the same decisions for netcdf & geos). Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV3seBAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrxCMIQALjXXpMg98CvhurG+sz4SUlc bxrJaXxh8AhtblqEAX5KErbji16WWRcB02EeTFlWCabWl5EuXpm1U0g0Zgg2EaM4 XaYhsuEXZOk0gbjcsDIVyTa3dIR8b4WxCdsTQNDRipJoxuDdE86MwhJBUuS5hO0F h/Rf/cbQJRhvCTHu8KzuNu4KJGw0H42lEXbQkd4MhUR8HxUUhBdSUlnsphltu3Ee k8KZwLbbslmuw7wLrV5/OmtTcd/pnMpTbuU09QfaJkf7Kdl6rh6QMLzNvFQkkpPC t2o16gk1bHyLkpc1Ixmx1ChFrYK35Qiqomv8RTII4RfhUaTDbeXbq5Y3YprLcF3Q ErW0NZE8WUN0DQk2DzHCkWeW72GLHq9P88VtTOrl4WZisaKA+sH1/I2oVDYG8/t5 GZOEbX0lJ0su70fOE48Mqy0nwbcGDD+C7+YwvHd6F8HWwVpvkkSGkBVC0Uc77f2I zcJ7+7HVR8AbOvd97xhukjD+0P9eefHyacJZkF5qAE40XmVOVAyCJwMBa4/CaSN9 uuu7t/YMWbv6HYCPq4s4+4Y7Mle1SoiK6E97j07U28j5/ZrvUZ5eSCpVSbBRWqmL j/jbv4X+KIkz7WS/kPGWrWNzOVRM6ITA5nQGOZY9nENXUNH6dNuaEGlVb331Sy87 qgyfIujv3WcSW9U29V1t =48Hu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
