Hi, sry for the delay. I missed the python-selenium mails sorry for that. Normally i would not prefer an updated of the python-selenium stuff. It would be better to do a package of the whole selenium stuff but i will take a look to update it during the debconf.
Regards Sascha Am 20.05.2015 um 08:34 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > Here's a patch provided by Federico Gimenez > <federico.gimenez.ni...@canonical.com>. Please consider applying it, > removing the .xpi from the orig.tar.gz, and uploading to Sid. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: Question about python-selenium > Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:50:39 -0400 > From: Federico Gimenez <federico.gimenez.ni...@canonical.com> > Reply-To: fgime...@canonical.com > To: Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> > > > > Hi Thomas, the patch is attached for you to have a look, in this case > the binaries are simply removed, I didn't manage to find a way to > compile from source. You didn't put the reference for sending it you > mentioned in your email, were you referring to [1]? > > Thanks, > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770232 > > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org > <mailto:z...@debian.org>> wrote: > > On 05/12/2015 01:18 PM, Federico Gimenez wrote: > > Hi Thomas, I think that I've met you before, working for some > debian pear packages (xml related?), glad to get in contact again. > > I've seen in [1] that you were interested in getting > python-selenium > updated, I have been working on a PPA [2] which removes the > non-free > binaries and also adds some other niceties from members of the > team I > belong to. > > Do you think that these changes (with the needed fixes to adapt > this > work to the debian standards) can be added to the archive as a > proper NMU? > > Thanks, regards > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770232 > [2] > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~fgimenez/+junk/python-selenium/files > > -- > Federico Gimenez > fgime...@canonical.com <mailto:fgime...@canonical.com> > <mailto:fgime...@canonical.com <mailto:fgime...@canonical.com>> > > > Hi Federico, > > Before attempting to do an NMU, you should first send a bug report > to Debian, and attach the patch you're proposing. Only if the > current maintainer doesn't reply, then you can attempt to NMU. The > thing is, it would need to be a repacked version of Selenium (ie: > the xpi removed from the orig file), and maybe we would need to ship > the non-free xpi files as a separate package in non-free. > > Could you send your patch to [1] ? > > Does your patch build the xpi now? How does it work? If it's what it > does, then great. If not, then it's nice still. > > Thomas > > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
