Ed, Thanks for your help. Could you please confirm that there is a link in between testOptimizedInterleavePatterns.cpp and testBoxAlgo.cpp ? issue #67 only relates to testBoxAlgo.cpp and testBox.cpp issues. While my original post mentionned issue with testOptimizedInterleavePatterns.cpp.
Thanks for further comments. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Ed Hanway <ehan...@ilm.com> wrote: > It is noted in the comments for this issue: > https://github.com/openexr/openexr/issues/67 Per the latest comment on > the issue thread, the problem is in the test rather than in the library > itself. Sorry that it hasn't been addressed since the issue was filed in > 2013 -- it doesn't show up on the platforms we use regularly build for, > which are mainly 64-bit, or we would have cleaned it up long ago. > > > > *From:* openexr-devel-bounces+ehanway=ilm....@nongnu.org [mailto: > openexr-devel-bounces+ehanway=ilm....@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Mathieu > Malaterre > *Sent:* Sunday, July 05, 2015 9:35 AM > *To:* openexr-de...@nongnu.org > *Cc:* 791...@bugs.debian.org > *Subject:* [Openexr-devel] testOptimizedInterleavePatterns.cpp > > > > Hi all, > > I am preparing the debian package for openexr. I am running in the > following issue, when the test suite runs, here is what I get (debian > jessie x86/32bits): > > [...] > Running testOptimizedInterleavePatterns > Testing SSE optimisation with different interleave patterns (large images) > ... > 0, 0: RGBHalf read as RGBHalf... OK > 0, 1: RGBHalf read as RGBAHalf... OK > 0, 2: RGBHalf read as ABGRHalf... OK > 0, 3: RGBHalf read as RGBFloat... > > error reading back channel B pixel 96,-62 got -nan expected -nan > lt-IlmImfTest: testOptimizedInterleavePatterns.cpp:238: bool > {anonymous}::compare(const Imf_2_2::FrameBuffer&, const > Imf_2_2::FrameBuffer&, const Box2i&, bool): Assertion > `writtenHalf.bits()==readHalf.bits()' failed. > /bin/bash: line 5: 25131 Aborted ${dir}$tst > FAIL: IlmImfTest > ================== > 1 of 1 test failed > ================== > [...] > > > > This is a hard-failure based on an assert(). Is there an actual issue in > openexr 2.2.0 ? > > > > Thanks much, >
