2005 m. February 12 d., Saturday 01:53, jūs rašėte:
Hi Torsten,

> You know that the OpenSSL compat layer has nearly identical issues to
> the OpenSSL lib itself? The old patch did not use it because of them.
The only problems I'm aware of are licensing issues. Compat layer is licensed 
under GPL, isn't it? Are there any other issues?

Actually, compat layer is quite crappy by itself. I've just taken some ideas 
from it.

> Nice! But as I said the compat layer will pose a problem. And - I am
> working on a patch for current OpenLDAP CVS as well together with
> somebody from univention.de. I'd rather use something I can fix instead
> of using third party code again and trying to keep it alive later.
What direction are you going? Are you rewriting tls.c and other parts of 
OpenLDAP code implementing OpenSSL API or try to simulate OpenSSL behavior 
(produce compatibility layer)? I've gone the latter way although some 
functions are almost impossible to simulate.

> Your help is of course very welcome, I'd like to join forces to get this
> up and running.
No problem. I could help.

> I could move my current working tree to svn.debian.org 
> or something if needed.
This would be grate.

Regards,
Modestas

Attachment: pgplLCl0Wkaim.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to