Package: libphonenumber6
Version: 6.3~svn698-3+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.1.1-towo.2-siduction-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages libphonenumber6 depends on:
WARNING: I MODIFIED THIS!
It also depends on
libboost-date-time1.55 - cannot be installed (1.58 installed)
libboost-threads1.55 - cannot be installed (1.58 installed)
ii libc6 2.19-19
ii libgcc1 1:5.2.1-14
ii libicu52 52.1-10
ii libprotobuf9 2.6.1-1
ii libstdc++6 5.2.1-14
ii multiarch-support 2.19-19
libphonenumber6 recommends no packages.
libphonenumber6 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
With this package not working (and does not compile from source, fails one of
the tests)
all my graphical system (gnome) collapsed and became completely unusable.
Why such a package should must be related so strictly to a version of libboost?
Why cannot it be related to a version grater than 1.55?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
