On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 15:28 +0100, Alfredo Pironti wrote: > Package: mono > Version: 1.1.10-1 > Followup-For: Bug #333851 > > Hi, > the mono package is still missing the dependency to libmono0 (or > at list a recommends).
Yes and it's right that way. Nothing in mono uses anything (since its an empty package, how could it? :) from libmono0. > > Moreover packages such as monodevelop should depend on mono, and not > on all mono-* packages, otherwise mono dependencies are useless, and > should be put in mono-commons (which is probably not what you want). Nope they shouldn't, mono is a meta package and nothing should depend on it. So this bug stays closed since everything is right as it is. -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
