On Thursday, July 16, 2015 08:04:08 PM Joachim Breitner wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Dear ftp-masters, > > the Debian Haskell Group has identified a set of 106 packages that are > probably not worth keeping in Debian. I hope you donât mind me not > opening 106 separate bug reports about that :-) > ... > > > According to dak rm -R -n, with my dak patch from #792578 applied, there are > no reverse dependency problems. > > > Thanks, > Joachim > > ¹ a few packages, like haskell-cgi, cannot be removed at that point yet, > but will follow soon.
Did your check include build-depends? According to dak the following issues
remain:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
darcs: libghc-hashed-storage-dev (< 0.6)
libghc-hashed-storage-dev (>= 0.5.6)
haskell-optparse-applicative: libghc-test-framework-th-prime-dev (< 0.1)
libghc-test-framework-th-prime-dev (>= 0.0)
haskell-stringprep: libghc-ranges-dev (>= 0.2.2)
libghc-ranges-doc
libghc-ranges-prof
haskell-uuid: libghc-maccatcher-doc
haskell-wai-websockets: libghc-io-streams-dev (< 1.2)
libghc-io-streams-dev (>= 1.1)
libghc-io-streams-doc
libghc-io-streams-prof
haskell-websockets: libghc-io-streams-dev (< 1.2)
libghc-io-streams-dev (>= 1.1)
libghc-io-streams-prof
mighttpd2: libghc-unix-bytestring-dev
yi: libghc-cautious-file-dev (>= 1.0.1)
libghc-cautious-file-doc
libghc-cautious-file-prof
libghc-data-accessor-template-dev (< 0.2.2)
libghc-data-accessor-template-dev (>= 0.2.1.3)
libghc-data-accessor-template-doc
libghc-data-accessor-template-prof
libghc-rosezipper-dev (< 0.3)
libghc-rosezipper-dev (>= 0.1)
libghc-rosezipper-doc
libghc-rosezipper-prof
libghc-vte-dev
libghc-vte-doc
libghc-vte-prof
Just to spot check, I checked yi and some, if not all, of that seems to be
valid. Please remove the moreinfo bug once this is investigated/resolved.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
