On 07/22/2015 08:05 PM, Andrew Ayer wrote: > tags 793244 + confirmed > thanks > > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:33:34 +0000 > Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > >> GCC PR libstdc++/66145 is a regression in GCC 5 which won't be fixed >> upstream in time for the GCC defaults change. The work around is to >> rebuild the affected packages after GCC 5 is the default compiler. >> Please look at the code and decide, if the package is affected. If >> not, please just close the issue. If it's a real issue, I'll add >> the packages affected to libstdc++6's Breaks attributes, with the >> version of the package at the time of the defaults change. > > I've confirmed that git-crypt is affected. However, are you sure that > rebuilding is a sufficient workaround? When I tried building with g++ > 5.2.1-11 from experimental, I had to use -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 in > order to successfully catch std::ios_base::failure. Should I modify > git-crypt to build with this flag?
no, that was an omission in libstdc++6, now fixed in 5.2.1-12. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
