On 2015-07-23 17:09, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 23.07.2015 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2015-07-23 16:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition
tracker,
even though it built successfully with ffmpeg?
Because building successfully doesn't mean building sanely.
Package: libvtk6.1
Source: vtk6 (6.1.0+dfsg2-6)
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-6+b1
Specifically, I got the right reason but the wrong reason for it. :-)
It's still bad because libvtk6.1 is still in sid. And libvtk6.1 is
still
in sid because of the mess that is the vtk6 "transition" (#749395,
which
has been going on for over a year now).
Ah, that explains it. There is a vtk6.1 -> vtk6.2 transition [1]
going on in the middle of the vtk -> vtk6 transition [2].
Maybe scheduling binNMUs for the packages depending on libvtk6.1
(gammaray, liggghts, mia, nifti2dicom, therion) would help?
It would, if libvtk6.2 would build in sid on all architectures where 6.1
builds, which it doesn't. (The whole thing is a horrible mess, that much
we can certainly agree on.)
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
