On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:48:35PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2015-07-21 at 15:20 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > No, startx has also worked on my machine without the executable bit on that
> > file. It's lightdm that seems to be depending on something others don't.
>
> I had the impression that startx (without argument) would use Xsession.
> At least the Xsession file header gives that impression.
On related note, this system executes the ~/.xsession file as a shell
script, but it isn't executable :)
> > If this is an actual requirement of some standard, please reassign the bug
> > to the owner of the file (x11-common) and have them enforce the standard.
>
> It's already done. x11-common ships Xsession with executable bit.
Well, then it shouldn't ship it as a conffile, because that implies they
can't maintain the enforcement, as the user is allowed to do all sorts of
things to conffiles (and usually expected to).
(Executable configuration file - doesn't that just sound wrong?)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
