On 2015-07-15 15:06, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.5.33 > Severity: normal > > Hi, >
Hi, :) > It was brought to my attention that the errors exploded on several > early boot packages whose functionality is implemented directly by > systemd. > > At [1] a list can be gotten of all the units overriden by systemd. The > lintian check should omit the warning for all of those. > > I will try to provide a patch for this soonish. If someone beats me to > it, better :). > Sounds good, I will be looking forward to a patch. :> > Also, is an array listing all the units the correct approach, or > should something more elaborate be used? I'm thinking of something > like the obsolete packages list. If so, a quick intro on how to do it > would be great. I will start with the array approach unless you say > otherwise. > > [1] > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/systemd.links > Certainly: * Have you tried reading the tutorial Lintian::Tutorial::WritingChecks? - See the "Using static data files" section[1] * If the above is insufficient, please let me know what can be done to improve it. :) Thanks, ~Niels [1] https://lintian.debian.org/library-api/Lintian/Tutorial/WritingChecks.html#Using_static_data_files -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
