On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Freitag, 10. Juli 2015, Paul Wise wrote: >> Thanks, however this contains too much data > > it has the same data as the current json?!? why is that "too much"?
It was a poor choice of words. Apologies for that. Essentially, the interface between reproducible builds and the tracker is too leaky and pushes decisions about what to display and where to the tracker when they should be made by the reproducible builds infrastructure instead. Having only a mapping between package name, message to show and URL to link back to would be best. This would avoid breaking URLs in the future as the JSON would contain the right URLs. This would avoid showing things on the tracker when reproducible builds folks don't want them to be shown. For example, if RB folks start caring about unreproducibility introduced in security uploads, that should be reflected in the JSON and not require changes to the tracker code. I hope that helps and I am sorry for what I said on IRC yesterday. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
