On Sun, 05 Jul 2015, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Thanks for pointing it out, and sorry you've been finding my packaging > approach hard to deal with -- for my part, I've always found patch > systems unnecessarily cumbersome, especially when sources are already > under conventional version control.
I was of the same opinion for a while as well (until the monolithic patch grew out of hands for the fail2ban package ;) ) It is just that some changes seems to be dealt with upstream already but there is no easy way (besides may be inspecting git log) to see how those conflicts need to be resolved. But what I wanted to say is just thanks for maintaining and use whatever means you find most comfortable for you -- My cry was out of the moment of weakness I guess ;) Cheers! -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Research Scientist, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
