On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > tags 791403 = jessie > stop > > On 04/07/15 15:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > user release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > usertags 791403 = pu > > tags 791403 = jessie moreinfo > > thanks > > > > On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 14:17 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > >> UserTags: unblock > >> > >> > >> This is a proposed upload to stable for jessie. > > > > Then it's not an unblock request. > > > > Sorry about that, I had actually look at a couple of other bugs in the > BTS and they had unblock so I copied it. I won't do it again.
For stable updates? Hmmm, there will be a few that started off as unblock requests before release and got converted to p-u requests afterwards as they didn't make it before release. There shouldn't be any stable update requests that are tagged "unblock" /now/ though. [...] > I am also keen to make sure I'm > really doing the right thing in postinst and postrm, I would welcome any > other opinions on that. My initial thought was that if the plugins need the daemon to be restarted then it feels like there should be a better method, e.g. a trigger. That's likely to be too heavy-weight a change for a stable update though. > In any case, I've now gone and made a branch for jessie and built a > package, there is a debdiff attached Thanks. > I looked at the email in that link, it mentions the +deb8u1 suffix. If > the stable update is identical to the version that was uploaded to > unstable then is it necessary to use a suffix? You can't upload two different packages with the same version, or the same package to multiple suites, so yes. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
