On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 03:34:53PM +0200, Michael Schaller wrote: > > On 06/28/2015 10:39 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Michael Schaller wrote: > > > > I reworded it a bit: > > - Dropped the filename to make the subject shorter > > - Dropped the '.' at the end of the subject > > - Changed from past to present tense > > - Made one sentence out of the paragraph > > > > and applied it to the debian/sid branch. > > > > Thanks. The following patches hopefully go smoother... > > The next patch is what previously patch 3/5 was. Please let me know what you > think of the added constructor argument. If you think that this change could > break third-party code then the rawtype could also be inferred by going > through the list of BaseDependency objects, getting their rawtype and > ensuring that they all have the same rawtype.
Committed. This *should not* break anything. If it does, we'll see it. I dropped to po/ part, as there was no new string in there, so it was just mostly-unrelated noise (just line number changes). A longer paragraph would have been nice, I forgot about this before pushing it. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. Be friendly, do not top-post, and follow RFC 1855 "Netiquette". - If you don't I might ignore you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
