On 22/06/15 15:59, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:43:27AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:52:52PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 17/06/15 18:14, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>>> Please binNMU the list of packages below in unstable. As changelog
>>>> entry, we can use
>>>>
>>>>   Rebuild for ruby2.2 support
>>>>
>>>> The list:
>>>
>>> That happened, and only a couple of packages failed to build on one 
>>> architecture:
>>>
>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html
>>>
>>> Have you looked at those? Should we start the second round?
>>
>> I will give you a list for the second round ASAP.
> 
> qdbm
> remctl
> rrdtool
> ruby-fcgi
> ruby-filesystem
> ruby-god
> ruby-narray
> ruby-odbc
> ruby-rmagick
> ruby-sdl
> ruby-taglib2
> ruby-uconv
> stfl
> hyperestraier
> libguestfs
> mapserver
> ruby-hdfeos5
> ruby-mpi
> ruby-netcdf
> ruby-passenger
> ruby-redcarpet
> thin

Scheduled.

> All others either FTBFS, or just use the default ruby (which should
> be fine), or don't use the supported versions reported by
> ruby-defaults/gem2deb. They will need to be looked at individually.
> 
> I should be able to workaround a large part of the FTBFS by adding a
> dependency to gem2deb, and after that I will be able to file FTBFS bugs.
> 
> Additionally, can you please adjust the ben file to remove false
> positives on arch:all packages?
> 
> Affected: .architecture ~ /any/ & .depends ~ /libruby/

Why? Aren't the arch:all ones something that should be dealt with as well? Not
through binNMUs obviously, but the tracker lets you know when they have been
fixed or how many stuff is still using other ruby versions.

Actually from a closer look I see that those two depend on libruby, but not on
libruby2.X. So they shouldn't be tracked because of that. I've fixed the
is_affected regex to look for /libruby2/, which fixed that.

Cheers,
Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to