found 96990 5.93-5 found 96990 5.2.1-2 stop ls still prints an extra terminal slash when the directory is named with a terminal slash. In combination with -F, the result is two terminal slashes.
The question is, should "ls -d foo/" produce a listing where directory foo is listed as "foo/"? $ ls --version ls (coreutils) 5.2.1 $ /bin/ls foo $ /bin/ls -F foo/ $ /bin/ls -Fd foo foo/ $ /bin/ls -Fd foo/ foo// $ /bin/ls -d foo/ foo/ $ ls --version ls (GNU coreutils) 5.93 $ ls foo $ /bin/ls foo $ /bin/ls -F foo/ $ /bin/ls -Fd foo foo/ $ /bin/ls -Fd foo/ foo// $ /bin/ls -d foo/ foo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
