Hi Edmund! Thanks for your patch!
> Bug #789163 claims that firejail "fails to build on several > architectures since seccomp isn't universally available on Linux": That description was a bit misleading. Some syscalls are not available on all architectures, which lead to the build failure there. > So, should firejail be enabled on arm64? Or is something else > required? For the next upstream release I can enable building for all Linux architectures again, as something very similar to your patch got applied upstream already (and will be contained in the next release [1]). Regards, Reiner [1]: http://sourceforge.net/p/firejail/tickets/17/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
