On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 02:17:39 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2015-06-19 00:54:02 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:29:15 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > [...] > > > I thought that merged bugs shared the same "found" list, otherwise > > > this doesn't seem to really make sense. > > > > Apparently, the version tracking info is not necessarily equal for all > > the bugs that are merged with each other. > > Quoting from <https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge>: [...] > This page has contradictory information.
If that documentation page is unclear, this should be reported as a separate bug against the correct (pseudo-)package, maybe against the www.debian.org pseudo-package or rather against the bugs.debian.org pseudo-package... > If this were the case, > forcemerge would not propagate found and fixed versions. But > they are propagated as seen here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=86;bug=764322 > > and looking at the details on each bug page. I propose that this bug report is reassigned to debbugs, requesting a modification of the BTS to automatically join found and fixed version lists, when merging bugs and to keep those lists in sync among merged bugs. Of course, the documentation should be changed accordingly. I'll reassign this bug report myself, if you don't object. Please let me know what you think. Thanks! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpTLB1G3ka68.pgp
Description: PGP signature
