HI Emilio,

On  Do 18 Jun 2015 10:33:01 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

On 18/06/15 10:25, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Michael,

On  Do 18 Jun 2015 10:04:53 CEST, Michael Biebl wrote:

Am 18. Juni 2015 09:44:21 MESZ, schrieb Mike Gabriel
<mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de>:
Package: src:libgtop2
Version: 2.30.0-3

Dear maintainers,

The recent upload of 2.30.0-1 (and later) breaks all binary packages
in unstable that have been compiled against an earlier version of
libgtop2.

The reason is the name change of the bin:package libgtop2-7 to
libgtop-2.0-10 without adding a Provides: libgtop2-7 field.

Please add that Provides: field

I hope this is a joke and you are not serious about this. Closing.

I'd appreciate a suggestion on how to solve the above issue.

Currently, your upload blocks the MATE team's workflow of bringing MATE 1.10 to
experimental as the reported issue occurs during package build.

Of course, I could re-upload marco or file the binNMU myself, but that cannot be
a generic approach for such a situation, right? I am eager to learn at this
point, how you would handle this.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788876
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgtop2.html

Transitions are not currently handled for packages that are in experimental. If you notice such a package, please file a binnmu bug against release.debian.org.

Adding the provides as you suggested is simply crazy. Libraries are renamed for
a reason, and adding Provides that way would defeat the purpose.

Thanks. I get that now and also missed the auto-libgtop2 transition.

I will files that binNMU now.

Thanks,
Mike
--

DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148

GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de

freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb

Attachment: pgpckYiTO41N6.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Reply via email to