HI Emilio, On Do 18 Jun 2015 10:33:01 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 18/06/15 10:25, Mike Gabriel wrote:Hi Michael, On Do 18 Jun 2015 10:04:53 CEST, Michael Biebl wrote:Am 18. Juni 2015 09:44:21 MESZ, schrieb Mike Gabriel <mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de>:Package: src:libgtop2 Version: 2.30.0-3 Dear maintainers, The recent upload of 2.30.0-1 (and later) breaks all binary packages in unstable that have been compiled against an earlier version of libgtop2. The reason is the name change of the bin:package libgtop2-7 to libgtop-2.0-10 without adding a Provides: libgtop2-7 field. Please add that Provides: fieldI hope this is a joke and you are not serious about this. Closing.I'd appreciate a suggestion on how to solve the above issue.Currently, your upload blocks the MATE team's workflow of bringing MATE 1.10 toexperimental as the reported issue occurs during package build.Of course, I could re-upload marco or file the binNMU myself, but that cannot bea generic approach for such a situation, right? I am eager to learn at this point, how you would handle this.https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788876 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgtop2.htmlTransitions are not currently handled for packages that are in experimental. If you notice such a package, please file a binnmu bug against release.debian.org.Adding the provides as you suggested is simply crazy. Libraries are renamed fora reason, and adding Provides that way would defeat the purpose.
Thanks. I get that now and also missed the auto-libgtop2 transition. I will files that binNMU now. Thanks, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
pgpckYiTO41N6.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur