Hi Tiago, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <ti...@debian.org> writes: > 1. Is there any place where we can find the sources for TimGM6mb > soundfont? If not, do you know how could we extract the binary file? > Otherwise I can't see how it could be accepted. In case we can't find an > immediate solution for that, would you mind if I drop > musescore-soundfont-gm binary from musescore package until we get > timgm6mb-soundfont accepted?
I have found a source at [1], linked from [2]. I think this is canonical. Note that the sf2 format is the preferred form for modification for soundfonts, and so I believe it counts as source anyway. For comparison, this is how fluid-soundfont is distributed. [1] http://ocmnet.com/saxguru/TimGM6mb.sf2 [2] http://ocmnet.com/saxguru/Timidity.htm > 2. Is there any reason to keep +dfsg1 in the package name? I couldn't > see why we'd need to prepare a new tarball for the current version. I think I had to modify the source tarball to remove some binaries that otherwise get installed. In my get-orig-source rule, I have find -name *pdf -exec rm {} + && \ rm thirdparty/rtf2html/rtf2html but it probably needs updating.. Best, Toby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
