Am 14.06.2015 um 13:59 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 14/06/15 13:36, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 14.06.2015 um 13:30 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>> I'm not too thrilled by the thought of that, tbh. >>> file-roller also requires the nautils gsettings schema from nautilus-data. >> >> So, I checked the code, and file-roller uses >> _g_settings_new_if_schema_installed() to load the nautilus gsettings >> schema. So it should be able to cope with nautilus-data not being installed. >> >> I would therefore be ok with dropping the nautilus-data dependency. But >> I'm against splitting off the nautilus extension. It's a tiny lib after all. > > Can we exclude that from shlibdeps detection? If you don't have nautilus > installed, it doesn't matter that libnautilus-extension is missing. And if > both > are installed, then you can use the extension. I think we do that with various > other extensions/plugins.
Well, imho that's an unclean hack, since we can't reliably detect anymore, if the extension has been rebuilt against a new version of libnautilus-extension, should there be the an ABI bump, or is there? -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
