Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:32:12AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:47:29 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > So the question is rather to define first, what we want to see in the
> > new_packages table and than adapt the importer code. Until today I was
> > not aware that madison is using new_packages in UDD. While I think it
> > is cool that it has gained some wider use we should obviously specify
> > what should be in the table to make it fit for this purpose since as I
> > tried to explain above some packages are left out *intentionally* for
> > the purpose the table was created for (= usage in Blends tasks pages
> > where this information would only add noise).
>
> I think the table should reflect the data available on ftpmaster and if
> Blends stuff needs a slightly different set of data then there should be
> either a view or another table for the Blends stuff.
While I perfectly agree upon this principle you know that only those
things get implemented that are needed. Any patch is welcome to gather
also additional stuff but I have things ranked way higher on my todo
list.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
