On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 16:58 +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Nagios is fine if you're running a server farm. It's useless if your > > purpose is to perform friendly probing of a large heterogeneous network > > most of which consists of desktop-type systems not run by professional > > sysadmins. > We have thousands of nodes at the university,.. within clusters, as > workstations and dedicates experiment servers...
Surely you understand that it depends very strongly on the type of management in place. If not, please stop replying to this bug. > For none of them we use the Banner to determine whether it's up to > date... is the banner not even secured? If not this would be completely > useless to check whether an installation is "secure" as an attacker > could simply try to forge the banner. That's a completely different kind of attack. > Anyway... I don't think this is that much of an security issue - but > since there could be attacks where it's helpful to know the exact > version in order to save time... Like I say, I'm not aware of this being an issue in practice. If you know real details, then instead of replying to this bug with hypotheses, please point me at real examples. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org