Hello James, James McCoy [2015-05-11 22:45 -0400]: > The .changes was from an “sbuild -A …” so it didn't have the source > package information. Using mergechanges to get a source+binary .changes > worked. > > There was no clue this was the problem from the output of adt-run, > though.
Right. This is a consequence of adt-run's current design to allow an arbitrary number of "actions" on the command line, which also leads to confusion with argument ordering. As nobody actually seems to use this, and it causes way more confusion than it's worth, I plan to change the CLI to allow/require *exactly* one test "action" argument (source package, tree, etc.). This is tracked in https://launchpad.net/bugs/1453509 Once we have this, adding this kind of check will be a lot simpler. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
