On Tuesday 26 May 2015 11:58:12 Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:19:38PM +0200, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote: > > On Monday 25 May 2015 13:43:35 Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Version update is definitely inappropriate. > > > So the procedure would be a cherry-pick, yes... > > > > Will this be done in the repository for stable or should i work in my own > > That is the price-question. You filed this as "important". I am not sure > about that. I'd classify it as "normal" to be honest. >
Well, i suppose that's a matter of opinion. :) For me this bug really breaks libreoffice in a way that is pretty unusable for presentations, documents and spreadsheet that go a bit farther than the very basic functionality, hence the important bug. However, i understand that for some it may be considered a normal bug. You are the mantainer and i am sure you have a better judgment of the importance of a bug. So if you say it is normal, it is normal :D > Even if it was (a pre-req for getting something fixes in stable is >= > important, see [1]) I'd need a pre-approval for it. > I know, that's why i asked you if you were going to push this, i know a point release is coming and if this gets fixed in the stable repo i can workaround a bit on this, but if not, i am going to recompile the package with a patch for myself. Just wanted to know what to expect. Greetings and go on with the great work :D
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
